Creationist claims carbon dating

However, it has fluctuated up and down over the past ten thousand years.This is determined by analyzing the radiocarbon dates of bristlecone pines that are themselves a way of dating based on the amount of rings, which is very consistent.”[xiv] Tree-ring dating coincides with and calibrates the C-14 dating results.[xv] The magnetic field strength would affect the creation and decay rates of C-14, but even though it has fluctuated over Earth’s history, it has been more or less the same based on archaeological and geological data.In such cases, the errors belong to the creationists, not the carbon-14 dating method.Talk Origins clearly does not understand that Uniformitarian geology and Flood geology are two totally different theoretical systems.In their claims of errors, creationists do not consider misuse of the technique.

Radiometric dating can even work when elements move in or out of rocks.It has also been tested on items for which the age is known through historical records, such as parts of the Dead Sea scrolls and some wood from an Egyptian tomb.Multiple samples from a single object have been dated independently, yielding consistent results.If an object is really a million plus years old as interpreted by Uniformitarian geology then it should not have any Thank you, Talk Origins for proving the point of the claim.They are once again begging the question since the way to determine if an object is contaminated with "younger" or "older" carbon is by dating it with some other method.

Search for creationist claims carbon dating:

creationist claims carbon dating-79creationist claims carbon dating-47creationist claims carbon dating-67creationist claims carbon dating-23

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “creationist claims carbon dating”