Fusion christian dating Chat xxx con webcam gratis sin registrarse
That’s just over half a percent error in something that is supposedly multiple billions of years old.Of course, that error estimate is complete nonsense.Was Rb-87 or Sr-87 added to the rock by some unknown process?Was one of them removed from the rock by some unknown process?
In other words, there is a 95% certainty that the age is somewhere between 4,283 23 million years and 4,283 – 23 million years.This newly-pointed-out flaw in the isochron method is a stark reminder of that.A good isochron was supposed to be rock-solid evidence (pun intended) that the radioactive date is reliable. I suspect that this flaw is not the last one that will be uncovered.Since a neutron has no charge, it must become positively charged after emitting an electron. Of course, there are all sorts of uncertainties involved.How much Sr-87 was in the rock when it first formed?